Did I miss Something?

Michael_Xi · Post by **Michael_Xi** » Sun Dec 04, 2005 3:00 am

Looking at this Sub-Forum, it appears to be a place to post and view, but it must be uncool to reply, with rare exception.
There are less than 4 threads on the front page with 20 or more replies as far as I remember.
Most have 5 or FEWER.
Is there something going on here that I missed?
:?:

Asher · Post by **Asher** » Sun Dec 04, 2005 8:21 am

-posts in case it is uncool to do so-

Honestly? I'm just not clever very often and i'd rather say nothing at all then blurt out some dorky reply that would ruin an otherwise fun and amusing thread.

Post by **darkvader** » Sun Dec 04, 2005 12:10 pm

Well, when people are posting links like this :iblislink:

, the only response that most people could post after clicking would be something like:

"EEEEWWWWWWW!!!!!!"

And who really wants to have a thread where the responses are like that?

junkie christ · Post by **junkie christ** » Sun Dec 04, 2005 12:33 pm

DarkVader wrote:And who really wants to have a thread where the responses are like that?

me and ibbie, thats who.
:-)

iblis · Post by **iblis** » Sun Dec 04, 2005 1:02 pm

junkie christ wrote:
DarkVader wrote:And who really wants to have a thread where the responses are like that?
me and ibbie, thats who.

amen!

Coor · Post by **Coor** » Sun Dec 04, 2005 2:44 pm

EEEEWWWWWWWWWWW!

B_Ko · Post by **B_Ko** » Sun Dec 04, 2005 9:30 pm

DarkVader wrote:Well, when people are posting links like this , the only response that most people could post after clicking would be something like:

"EEEEWWWWWWW!!!!!!"

And who really wants to have a thread where the responses are like that?

Or if it's something like this :iblislink:

then a response to that would be something like this:

:tubgirl:

badkiity · Post by **badkiity** » Sun Dec 04, 2005 10:45 pm

It makes me feel like this. Happy< :shock:

< Not so happy. But I already knew what the lemon party was. Pucker up! :twisted:

junkie christ · Post by **junkie christ** » Mon Dec 05, 2005 8:09 pm

B_Ko wrote:
DarkVader wrote:Well, when people are posting links like this , the only response that most people could post after clicking would be something like:

"EEEEWWWWWWW!!!!!!"

And who really wants to have a thread where the responses are like that?
Or if it's something like this then a response to that would be something like this:

tubgirl got taken down
lemonparty however was a new one. that made Fallen RUN OUT OF THE ROOM
:dup:

thanks!

Michael_Xi · Post by **Michael_Xi** » Tue Dec 06, 2005 1:55 am

OK, so, What WAS "tubgirl"?
:confused:

junkie christ · Post by **junkie christ** » Tue Dec 06, 2005 2:37 am

Michael_Xi wrote:OK, so, What WAS "tubgirl"?

google it.
its mirrored a few places still i believe.
archived and on file..........

B_Ko · Post by **B_Ko** » Wed Dec 07, 2005 6:31 pm

Michael_Xi wrote:OK, so, What WAS "tubgirl"?

What was tubgirl?

Delicious.

Post by **darkvader** » Wed Dec 07, 2005 8:54 pm

Michael_Xi wrote:OK, so, What WAS "tubgirl"?

Here you go! :iblislink:

And in case anybody is wondering, that site (redcoat.net) is what tubgirl always redirected to.

And it's local. Farragut, I believe.

Thrall · Post by **Thrall** » Wed Dec 07, 2005 9:38 pm

DarkVader wrote:
Here you go!

And in case anybody is wondering, that site (redcoat.net) is what tubgirl always redirected to.

And it's local. Farragut, I believe.

baby, you are full of usefull information.

Michael_Xi · Post by **Michael_Xi** » Thu Dec 08, 2005 3:33 am

DarkVader wrote:
Michael_Xi wrote:OK, so, What WAS "tubgirl"?

Here you go!

And in case anybody is wondering, that site (redcoat.net) is what tubgirl always redirected to.

And it's local. Farragut, I believe.

OK, NM.
Odd they blur the pussy while showing all that crap.
Is this what KG has come to?
Beavis and Butthead were more entertaining than the crap that I see people responding to on this board....
I have seen at least 3 images on this board in the last few days that make me want to Block KG altogether.
I'm fine w/ Hardcore images.
"Appropriate Accessibility" is another issue.
If all of these images are OK, I'm shocked at the stance regarding images in general, and feel a real lack of respect for anything, especially the considerations, (Or lack thereof) given to my Uncle in spite of the relaxation of the Camera rules.
Either Command Respect or Don't.
This Shit is just that.
Shit.
If this board allows that, so be it.
it's not what I expected or would EVER Expect based on what has been presented to me as "Representative of a Higher Standard" in our scene.
I have to watch how much I drink, but we can watch Mocha spew from an ugly chick's asshole....
:roll:

junkie christ · Post by **junkie christ** » Thu Dec 08, 2005 3:51 am

Michael_Xi wrote:Odd they blur the pussy while showing all that crap.

ive been told they are blurring over the pubic hair, something about it being culturally rude
i dont know if thats true
but if it is, it shows how relative morality can really be.

iblis · Post by **iblis** » Thu Dec 08, 2005 9:50 pm

junkie christ wrote:
Michael_Xi wrote:Odd they blur the pussy while showing all that crap.

ive been told they are blurring over the pubic hair, something about it being culturally rude
i dont know if thats true
but if it is, it shows how relative morality can really be.

ew! pubes are gross!

hee.hee.fucking.hee!

:iblislink:

fucking

B_Ko · Post by **B_Ko** » Thu Dec 08, 2005 9:53 pm

iblis wrote:
junkie christ wrote:
Michael_Xi wrote:Odd they blur the pussy while showing all that crap.

ive been told they are blurring over the pubic hair, something about it being culturally rude
i dont know if thats true
but if it is, it shows how relative morality can really be.

ew! pubes are gross!

hee.hee.fucking.hee!

fucking

Dammit. I fucking clicked it. I didn't even look at the name of the link, so i guess i deserve that, but fucking fuck, ibbie.