The first link has too many flaws for me to really digest it. One of them is that they called druidism a "neo-pagan" religion. I don't imagine that the Gauls were neo-anything, chronologically speaking. But maybe they've another definition of druidism. Probably got it out of a Dungeons and Dragons handbook.
Or maybe I'm just crotchety today.
Anyway, I honestly can't accept that it's wrong to believe or disbelieve anything. That's the wonder of individual belief. Neuter the mind's ability to make its own conscious decisions about what is and is not, and you have yourself a theological corpse.
Not a zombie, mind, because zombies are cool - and there's nothing cool about a religious idiot; that is, someone who can't seek and believe for themselves.
If someone wants to worship, or even acknowlege their version of The Ultimate Evil™, that's their own business. The same applies for people who'd like to believe in Santa Claus (even though he
has been scientifically disproven, thanks to the Laws of Thermodynamics. The old fire and brimstone version of Hell was also clonked by the LoT, for that matter.
)
Myself, I think it's all quite silly, but that works for me. Whatever works for anyone else, well, who cares? They're more than welcome to it, so long as it doesn't spill my drink.
Im just making one. Not attacking what you said or anything, just adding to the discussion. It's getting pretty ineresting. 
