so I didn't know where else this should get posted, so here goes.

http://www.pentagonstrike.co.uk/pentagon.swf
http://www.pentagonstrike.co.uk

so I checked all of the pics that I found, couldn't verify any tampering. if someone else can find a flaw in any of that, please let me know, otherwise, be frightened. it seems that maybe we were lied to about some of what happened on 9/11

and spread the word if this is accurate, because it is something that as many people as possible need to know about.

-Chris

I posted on this the other day, and only one response. So I say, we talk about it.

http://www.knoxgothic.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=5538

yeah, but yours doesn't seem to link right, it makes me download the SWF file and it won't open like that for me

Fact : no plane crashed into the pentagon. the government obviously shot the plane to save itself. it would be very convienient for it to have hit the section that's being renovated, the government attempted a quick coverup by confiscating all survielance video from nearby businesses within minutes of the strike. the government poured sand and gravel accross the pentagon lawn, that way it appeared that there were plane skids.

assumption: the government attacked the pentagon to cover something up. the government either had enough knowledge to prevent much of the damage to the WTC or stop the damage alltogether, which means that the government sacrificed a few thousand citizens to take out some trash (bin laden, hussein, probly some other schmucks that deserve it)

it's pretty early so there was probably some other bigger point that I'm forgetting about

one word to all of this..........bullshit
next people will be saying pearl harbor wasnt really attacked

judas gnb wrote:one word to all of this..........bullshit
next people will be saying pearl harbor wasnt really attacked

Prove that a plane crashed there and I will give you props. Otherwise you are just being disagreable and vulgar.

Christ, nice to know everyone cares about a government blowing up civilian planes and getting away with it.

Oh. Well, we all know that the government controls the weather, the holocaust and moonlanding never really happened, and the world is really flat...its all just a conspiracy.

I am usually all about some conspiracy theories. But random videos on the internet can not be trusted. no matter how real they look.

this is however the best 911 conspiracy site i have seen yet.

http://911review.org/Wget/members.fortu ... hit-it.htm

I've read a lot about supposed 911 conspiracies, and have never heard of this one before. But I gave it a look.

I found these 3 major points:

*The hole created by the crash, is too small.
*The overall damage to the Pentagon was not as extensive as one would expect.
*That there is no evidence of Boeing 757 debris having been recovered from the site.

The Pentagon (don't remember if it was the whole thing or just this section) was intended to be a storage facility. The supports were extensive to hold all the weight. There are hundreds of small, very strong columns. There are also thick barriers allowing for fire protection and expansion between the sections. When the plane entered, it clipped the ground, partially destroying it. The rest of it was then easily ripped apart by the support, and could then not get any further because of the dividers.

As for the plane dissappearing from radar, I don't know enough about that subject to really say anything.

The most convincing site I have seen concerns the collapse of WTC 7, which I have heard very little of as far as popular media goes. It was supposedly destroyed by a chunk of something falling of one of the other towers, yet there are several pictures, from several sources, taken from several angles, of a huge black streak which can be traced from above the towers to wtc 7. This was never mentioned here, but was extensively talked about in Japan. A good site is here http://www.geocities.com/streakingobject/

The faces in the smoke, however subjective, are also touching and scary.

I would still think, even with extra supports, that there would be *some* plane debris, like wings since the hole is round, albeit too small for a commercial jet liner to fit through. I dunno, I suppose this subject is dead and I can't get anyone to pay attention to the media and government

Nevermind all the street witnesses that saw the plane hit the building. Or that the plane made a sharp turn, hit ground, then hit the pentagon, removing a lot of impact velocity, or that the pentago is one of the most secure buildings on the planet and was built with the idea it may one day be attacked in war and would need to be highly durable, because then the government doesn't look like evil crazies.

Um....yeah.....the ENTIRE government is really out to get us!!!! We should ALL stockpile supplies, build a compound 1,000 miles underground and figure out how to get them all back for their lies!!!!

OMG!!! Buttercup! I thought we were friends!!! You should have told me sooner that the world was flat! *cancels her trip to China*

Get fucking real people!!! While that, yes, alot in the government is corrupt, you are giving these people way too much credit. *goes to see just how far she can travel before falling off the Earth into oblivion*

Other than the obvious evidence, the main reason to believe the pentagon was actually hit is... Do you really think the government is *smart enough* to stage that? You cannot simultaneously think the government is full of idiots and has an enormous cover up.

dakarpsi wrote:I would still think, even with extra supports, that there would be *some* plane debris, like wings since the hole is round, albeit too small for a commercial jet liner to fit through.

One of the sites above has pictures of debris, and the are clearly some plane pieces in it. But if there weren't, I wouldn't be surprised. When a plane clips the ground, is flown at a high speed through hundreds of columns and concrete walls, and set on fire with jet fuel, you can bet there won't be much of it left.