Oh, I'm sure I'll remember. I'm currently borrowing this account since mine, Caustic, was banned, to clear some of the air here. I did try to contact Andrew privately. Upon not hearing a response, I posted what I did to get a response. It worked in regards to Jimmy's involvement in the shenanigans w...

Directly from the contract as posted:

"KnoxGothic.com reserves all other rights to any other use of images or recordings, including but not limited to sale of the images or recordings for profit or charity. "

What more really needs to be said?

Did you even read the other sentences in that post , Jeff? At all? You know I still adore you, but damn. I feel like you're blinded by this anti-KG obsession, and just latching on to the bits that feed it. Tell me if I'm wrong..... After seeing what has happened, particularly the recent banning of ...

After reading this thread I find it funny and in some ways sad that the people who are bitching the most aren't even Sanctus patrons (See Jeff and Adam). At one time in the past I was a Sanctus patron. At one time in the past Adam was a Sanctus DJ. I cannot speak for Adam, but I can speak for mysel...

Still haven't seen any part of the contract that camera carrying attendees of Sanctus are supposed to sign that would state that KG could not use the copyrighted material for commercial or advertising purposes without legal penalties. Copyright is Federal Law. Federal Law trumps State Law. Flawless...

I say lets put the camera issue to a vote? This is a good idea, but it looks like everybody has already voted. So far, the only ones who are in favor of the Copyright Theft Plan are KG and Ray+Wendy (do they count as 1 or 2 votes, I get confused), while everybody else thinks that this is a Bad Idea...

Still haven't seen any part of the contract that camera carrying attendees of Sanctus are supposed to sign that would state that KG could not use the copyrighted material for commercial or advertising purposes without legal penalties.

Why would you want to go to this when Temple is happening on the same night?

I wanted to quote the former post from mafiaman, but it was a bit too long. Damn, sorry about that. Next time I'll make sure to include cliff's notes for you people. If KG wants to use my stuff for advertising, then good. If it were some billion dollar corporation, it would be different. If KG want...

Well if you or others in the community want to donate a few thousand dollars to a legal defense fund that "might" be a possibility. Hey now, lets not get our panties in a twist here. I'm not the one asking to take people's copyright without compensating them. That means sometimes having to do some ...

Would it make everybody feel better if we add language to the contract to the effect that KG will not sell pictures you take? Would it make your position seem stronger on this issue? Yes. Why? Because then part of the contract would state that KG could not use the copyrighted material for commercia...

Caustic wrote:See? It's like a Sanctus you don't have to dress up for. Less eyeliner, no cover, and more of the '80s, '90s, and now.

You mean its just like 100.3, The River?

Wow! I can't wait to tune in!

Also, when a topic is locked, that means end of discussion on that topic. Opening a discussion or entering another thread with a post from a locked topic is not acceptable. Please don't do it again. Well, I'm awefully sorry about that, but I've always been one to pay attention to the man behind the...

First, the legal precent is that a photographer holds the copyright on a photograph. The subjects of the photograph do not receive copyright unless the photographer assigns it to them. We require that in order to receive a camera permit for a KG event, the photographer must sign his or her copyrigh...

mafiaman wrote: See, this is interesting to me because in order to have a valid copyright form like the one that has been suggested, EVERY PERSON WHO ATTENDS SANCTUS MUST DECLARE THAT KNOXGOTHIC HAS SOLE COPYRIGHT. This would include club staff as well in order to be valid. If anyone who attended di...

Legal precedent (Feist Publications, Inc. v. Rural Telephone Service Company, Inc., 111 S.Ct. 1282, 1287-88 (1991)) gives photographers (and others) the following rights: the right to reproduce work in copies (reproductive right); the right to produce derivative works based on the copyrighted works...

What you're having them sign is more of a licensing agreement. They still own the copyright, but they're agreeing to abide by certain restrictions if they want to take pictures at the club night. The two important aspects being no commercial use and removal upon request from somebody who could be c...

I'm through giving a shit! she makes me feel sane ...... and plus I hate people doing shit for... attaion and try to kill baby beacuse she thinks she pergnent nope no for drama for me good luck aaron. say all you want on this subjut I may soulds like a bitch but you do't know the hole story, I hope...

Why would I post on this thread when I haven't posted here for months? That same sense of bewilderment is present when I hear questions like this: "Why are there so many pics of anthropomorphic animals doing dirty interspecies anal, but so few of Godzilla getting a hummer from Mothra while Gigan ban...

Nope, not yet. I dunno, do you guys think that is time to have a poll and naming party?